Commit graph

21 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Rini
302b41d539 Kbuild: Always use $(PHASE_)
It is confusing to have both "$(PHASE_)" and "$(XPL_)" be used in our
Makefiles as part of the macros to determine when to do something in our
Makefiles based on what phase of the build we are in. For consistency,
bring this down to a single macro and use "$(PHASE_)" only.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2025-04-11 12:16:44 -06:00
Tom Rini
81ef65099e Merge patch series "drivers: Driver support for ADI SC5xx SoCs"
Greg Malysa <malysagreg@gmail.com> says:

This series adds all of the supported peripheral drivers for the sc5xx
series of SoCs from Analog Devices and other drivers that are used by
the evaluation kits, such as a GPIO expander used by the EZLITE carrier
boards. This series passes gitlab CI tests.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226173150.13198-1-malysagreg@gmail.com
2025-03-12 10:25:13 -06:00
Nathan Barrett-Morrison
d3bfe57788 remoteproc: Add in SHARC loading for ADI SC5XX-family processors
This adds the ability to load ldr-formatted files to the SHARC
coprocessors using the rproc interface. Only a minimal subset
of rproc functionality is supported: loading and starting
the remote core.

Secure boot and signed ldr verification are not available
at this time through the U-Boot interface.

Co-developed-by: Greg Malysa <malysagreg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Malysa <malysagreg@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Ian Roberts <ian.roberts@timesys.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Roberts <ian.roberts@timesys.com>
Co-developed-by: Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@timesys.com>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@timesys.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Bimpikas <vasileios.bimpikas@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Arturs Artamonovs <arturs.artamonovs@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Gaskell <Oliver.Gaskell@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Barrett-Morrison <nathan.morrison@timesys.com>
2025-03-12 10:24:58 -06:00
Hari Nagalla
c0e2ce5aee remoteproc: k3-m4: Introduce K3 remote proc driver for M4 subsystem
Some K3 devices like AM64, AM62 devices have a M4 processor in MCU
voltage domain.

Add a remote proc driver to support this subsystem to be able to load
and boot the M4 core.

Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
[Ryan: Fix implicitly include warning]
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
[Judith: Cleanup driver, fix warnings, remove lreset logic]
Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
2025-02-14 13:17:18 -06:00
Marek Vasut
5769328fab remoteproc: renesas: Add Renesas R-Car Gen4 remote processor driver
Add R-Car Gen4 APMU controller remoteproc driver capable of starting
the Cortex-R52 cores in Renesas R8A779G0 V4H/V4M SoC. The APMU IP is
in fact a power management unit capable of additional operations, but
those are not used by U-Boot so far.

This requires slight adjustment to the SPL entry point code, as that
is being executed on the Cortex-R52 #0 and the Cortex-R52 #0 enters an
endless loop once it starts the rest of the SPL on Cortex-A76 core.
The endless loop now checks for content of APMU CRBARP registers and
tests whether valid VLD_BARP and BAREN_VALID bits are set, if so, the
Cortex-R52 core exits the endless loop and jumps to address started
in CRBARP[31:18] register in ARM mode, which is a trampoline code to
jump to the final entry point.

The trampoline code is in place to avoid limitation of CRBARP[31:18]
address field, which limits the core start address to memory addresses
aligned to 0x40000 or 256 kiB . The trampoline is placed at 0x40000
aligned address and jumps to the final entry point, which can be at
an address with arbitrary alignment at instruction granularity.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
2024-12-29 16:55:31 +01:00
Simon Glass
c46760d596 global: Rename SPL_ to XPL_
Use XPL_ as the symbol to indicate an SPL build. This means that SPL_ is
no-longer set.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2024-10-11 11:44:48 -06:00
Nishanth Menon
a94a4071d4 tree-wide: Replace http:// link with https:// link for ti.com
Replace instances of http://www.ti.com with https://www.ti.com

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
2023-11-10 11:01:50 -05:00
Keerthy
fc6b41fefb remoteproc: ipu: Add driver to bring up ipu
The driver enables IPU support. Basically enables the clocks,
timers, watchdog timers and bare minimal MMU and supports
loading the firmware from mmc.

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
[Amjad: fix compile warnings]
Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@baylibre.com>
2022-02-08 11:00:03 -05:00
Keerthy
02bfcc5c3a remoteproc: pru: Add support for various PRU cores on K3 AM65x SoCs
The K3 AM65x family of SoCs have the next generation of the PRU-ICSS
processor subsystem, commonly referred to as ICSSG. Each ICSSG processor
subsystem on AM65x SR1.0 contains two primary PRU cores and two new
auxiliary PRU cores called RTUs. The AM65x SR2.0 SoCs have a revised
ICSSG IP that is based off the subsequent IP revision used on J721E
SoCs. This IP instance has two new custom auxiliary PRU cores called
Transmit PRUs (Tx_PRUs) in addition to the existing PRUs and RTUs.

Each RTU and Tx_PRU cores have their own dedicated IRAM (smaller than
a PRU), Control and debug feature sets, but is different in terms of
sub-modules integrated around it and does not have the full capabilities
associated with a PRU core. The RTU core is typically used to aid a
PRU core in accelerating data transfers, while the Tx_PRU cores is
normally used to control the TX L2 FIFO if enabled in Ethernet
applications. Both can also be used to run independent applications.
The RTU and Tx_PRU cores though share the same Data RAMs as the PRU
cores, so the memories have to be partitioned carefully between different
applications. The new cores also support a new sub-module called Task
Manager to support two different context thread executions.
The driver currently supports the AM65xx SoC

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210622063431.3151-3-lokeshvutla@ti.com
2021-07-15 17:56:04 +05:30
Lokesh Vutla
ab827b3857 remoteproc: Introduce K3 C66 and C71 remoteproc driver
Certain SoCs with K3 architecture have integrated a C66 Corepac DSP
subsystem and an advanced C71 DSPs. Introduce a remoteproc driver
that that does take care of loading an elf to any of the specified
DSPs and start it.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
2019-10-11 10:07:34 -04:00
Lokesh Vutla
4c850356a8 remoteproc: Introduce K3 remoteproc driver for R5F subsystem
SoCs with K3 architecture have an integrated Arm Cortex-R5F subsystem
that is comprised of dual-core Arm Cortex-R5F processor cores. This R5
subsytem can be configured at boot time to be either run in a LockStep
mode or in an Asymmetric Multi Processing (AMP) fashion in Split-mode.
This subsystem has each Tightly-Coupled Memory (TCM) internal memories
for each core split between two banks - TCMA and TCMB.

Add a remoteproc driver to support this subsystem to be able to load
and boot the R5 cores primarily in LockStep mode or split mode.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
2019-10-11 10:07:34 -04:00
Lokesh Vutla
54e4311fa1 remoteproc: k3_rproc: Rename to ti_k3_arm64_rproc
k3_rproc driver is specifically meant for controlling an arm64
core using TISCI protocol. So rename the driver, Kconfig symbol,
compatible and functions accordingly.

While at it drop this remoteproc selection for a53 defconfig.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
2019-07-26 21:49:25 -04:00
Fabien Dessenne
6bed04fbd4 remoteproc: Introduce STM32 Cortex-M4 remoteproc driver
This patch introduces support of Cortex-M4 remote processor for STM32
MCU and MPU families.

Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
2019-07-22 09:21:28 +02:00
Fabien Dessenne
7a7c4cb0f0 remoteproc: add elf file load support
The current implementation supports only binary file load.
Add helpers to support ELF32 format (sanity check, and load).
Note that since an ELF32 image is built for the remote processor, the
load function uses the device_to_virt ops to translate the addresses.
Implement a basic translation for sandbox_testproc.

Add related tests. Test result:
=> ut dm remoteproc_elf
Test: dm_test_remoteproc_elf: remoteproc.c
Test: dm_test_remoteproc_elf: remoteproc.c (flat tree)
Failures: 0

Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
2019-07-22 09:21:28 +02:00
Lokesh Vutla
08c45314a8 spl: Allow remoteproc drivers to be used within SPL
Add an option for building remoteproc drivers within SPL.

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
2018-09-11 08:32:55 -04:00
Lokesh Vutla
c365ed7d4b remoteproc: Introduce K3 remoteproc driver
Add support for K3 based remoteproc driver that
communicates with TISCI to start start a remote processor.

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
2018-09-11 08:32:55 -04:00
Lokesh Vutla
1ad190bf59 remoteproc: Introduce K3 system controller
K3 specific SoCs have a dedicated microcontroller for doing
resource management. Any HLOS/firmware on compute clusters should
load a firmware to this microcontroller before accessing any resource.
Adding support for loading this firmware.

After the K3 system controller got loaded with firmware and started
up it sends out a boot notification message through the secure proxy
facility using the TI SCI protocol. Intercept and receive this message
through the rproc start operation which will need to get invoked
explicitly after the firmware got loaded.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2018-09-11 08:32:55 -04:00
Tom Rini
83d290c56f SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from.  So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry.  Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.

In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.

This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents.  There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2018-05-07 09:34:12 -04:00
Nishanth Menon
4239284973 remoteproc: Add support for TI power processor
Many TI System on Chip (SoC) solutions do have a dedicated
microcontroller for doing power management functionality. These include
the AM335x, AM437x, Keystone K2G SoCs. The functionality provided by
these microcontrollers and the communication mechanisms vary very
widely. However, we are able to consolidate some basic functionality to
be generic enough starting with K2G SoC family. Introduce a basic remote
proc driver to support these microcontrollers. In fact, on SoCs starting
with K2G, basic power management functions are primarily accessible for
the High Level Operating Systems(HLOS) via these microcontroller solutions.

Hence, having these started at a bootloader level is pretty much
mandatory.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
2016-03-14 19:18:37 -04:00
Nishanth Menon
3df0b8b4da remoteproc: Introduce a sandbox dummy driver
Introduce a dummy driver for sandbox that allows us to verify basic
functionality. This is not meant to do anything functional - but is
more or less meant as a framework plumbing debug helper.

The sandbox remoteproc driver maintains absolutey no states and is a
simple driver which just is filled with empty hooks. Idea being to give
an approximate idea to implement own remoteproc driver using this as a
template.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-10-22 14:18:39 -04:00
Nishanth Menon
ddf56bc7e3 drivers: Introduce a simplified remoteproc framework
Many System on Chip(SoC) solutions are complex with multiple processors
on the same die dedicated to either general purpose of specialized
functions. Many examples do exist in today's SoCs from various vendors.
Typical examples are micro controllers such as an ARM M3/M0 doing a
offload of specific function such as event integration or power
management or controlling camera etc.

Traditionally, the responsibility of loading up such a processor with a
firmware and communication has been with a High Level Operating
System(HLOS) such as Linux. However, there exists classes of products
where Linux would need to expect services from such a processor or the
delay of Linux and operating system being able to load up such a
firmware is unacceptable.

To address these needs, we need some minimal capability to load such a
system and ensure it is started prior to an Operating System(Linux or
any other) is started up.

NOTE: This is NOT meant to be a solve-all solution, instead, it tries to
address certain class of SoCs and products that need such a solution.

A very simple model is introduced here as part of the initial support
that supports microcontrollers with internal memory (no MMU, no
execution from external memory, or specific image format needs). This
basic framework can then (hopefully) be extensible to other complex SoC
processor support as need be.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
2015-10-22 14:18:38 -04:00