mirror of
https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware.git
synced 2025-04-13 08:04:27 +00:00

MPMM is a core-specific microarchitectural feature. It has been present in every Arm core since the Cortex-A510 and has been implemented in exactly the same way. Despite that, it is enabled more like an architectural feature with a top level enable flag. This utilised the identical implementation. This duality has left MPMM in an awkward place, where its enablement should be generic, like an architectural feature, but since it is not, it should also be core-specific if it ever changes. One choice to do this has been through the device tree. This has worked just fine so far, however, recent implementations expose a weakness in that this is rather slow - the device tree has to be read, there's a long call stack of functions with many branches, and system registers are read. In the hot path of PSCI CPU powerdown, this has a significant and measurable impact. Besides it being a rather large amount of code that is difficult to understand. Since MPMM is a microarchitectural feature, its correct placement is in the reset function. The essence of the current enablement is to write CPUPPMCR_EL3.MPMM_EN if CPUPPMCR_EL3.MPMMPINCTL == 0. Replacing the C enablement with an assembly macro in each CPU's reset function achieves the same effect with just a single close branch and a grand total of 6 instructions (versus the old 2 branches and 32 instructions). Having done this, the device tree entry becomes redundant. Should a core that doesn't support MPMM arise, this can cleanly be handled in the reset function. As such, the whole ENABLE_MPMM_FCONF and platform hooks mechanisms become obsolete and are removed. Change-Id: I1d0475b21a1625bb3519f513ba109284f973ffdf Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
149 lines
5.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
149 lines
5.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
Firmware Configuration Framework
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
This document provides an overview of the |FCONF| framework.
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The Firmware CONfiguration Framework (|FCONF|) is an abstraction layer for
|
|
platform specific data, allowing a "property" to be queried and a value
|
|
retrieved without the requesting entity knowing what backing store is being used
|
|
to hold the data.
|
|
|
|
It is used to bridge new and old ways of providing platform-specific data.
|
|
Today, information like the Chain of Trust is held within several, nested
|
|
platform-defined tables. In the future, it may be provided as part of a device
|
|
blob, along with the rest of the information about images to load.
|
|
Introducing this abstraction layer will make migration easier and will preserve
|
|
functionality for platforms that cannot / don't want to use device tree.
|
|
|
|
Accessing properties
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Properties defined in the |FCONF| are grouped around namespaces and
|
|
sub-namespaces: a.b.property.
|
|
Examples namespace can be:
|
|
|
|
- (|TBBR|) Chain of Trust data: tbbr.cot.trusted_boot_fw_cert
|
|
- (|TBBR|) dynamic configuration info: tbbr.dyn_config.disable_auth
|
|
- Arm io policies: arm.io_policies.bl2_image
|
|
- GICv3 properties: hw_config.gicv3_config.gicr_base
|
|
|
|
Properties can be accessed with the ``FCONF_GET_PROPERTY(a,b,property)`` macro.
|
|
|
|
Defining properties
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Properties composing the |FCONF| have to be stored in C structures. If
|
|
properties originate from a different backend source such as a device tree,
|
|
then the platform has to provide a ``populate()`` function which essentially
|
|
captures the property and stores them into a corresponding |FCONF| based C
|
|
structure.
|
|
|
|
Such a ``populate()`` function is usually platform specific and is associated
|
|
with a specific backend source. For example, a populator function which
|
|
captures the hardware topology of the platform from the HW_CONFIG device tree.
|
|
Hence each ``populate()`` function must be registered with a specific
|
|
``config_type`` identifier. It broadly represents a logical grouping of
|
|
configuration properties which is usually a device tree file.
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
- FW_CONFIG: properties related to base address, maximum size and image id
|
|
of other DTBs etc.
|
|
- TB_FW: properties related to trusted firmware such as IO policies,
|
|
mbedtls heap info etc.
|
|
- HW_CONFIG: properties related to hardware configuration of the SoC
|
|
such as topology, GIC controller, PSCI hooks, CPU ID etc.
|
|
|
|
Hence the ``populate()`` callback must be registered to the (|FCONF|) framework
|
|
with the ``FCONF_REGISTER_POPULATOR()`` macro. This ensures that the function
|
|
would be called inside the generic ``fconf_populate()`` function during
|
|
initialization.
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
int fconf_populate_topology(uintptr_t config)
|
|
{
|
|
/* read hw config dtb and fill soc_topology struct */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
FCONF_REGISTER_POPULATOR(HW_CONFIG, topology, fconf_populate_topology);
|
|
|
|
Then, a wrapper has to be provided to match the ``FCONF_GET_PROPERTY()`` macro:
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
/* generic getter */
|
|
#define FCONF_GET_PROPERTY(a,b,property) a##__##b##_getter(property)
|
|
|
|
/* my specific getter */
|
|
#define hw_config__topology_getter(prop) soc_topology.prop
|
|
|
|
This second level wrapper can be used to remap the ``FCONF_GET_PROPERTY()`` to
|
|
anything appropriate: structure, array, function, etc..
|
|
|
|
To ensure a good interpretation of the properties, this documentation must
|
|
explain how the properties are described for a specific backend. Refer to the
|
|
:ref:`binding-document` section for more information and example.
|
|
|
|
Loading the property device tree
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The ``fconf_load_config(image_id)`` must be called to load fw_config and
|
|
tb_fw_config devices tree containing the properties' values. This must be done
|
|
after the io layer is initialized, as the |DTB| is stored on an external
|
|
device (FIP).
|
|
|
|
.. uml:: ../../resources/diagrams/plantuml/fconf_bl1_load_config.puml
|
|
|
|
Populating the properties
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Once a valid device tree is available, the ``fconf_populate(config)`` function
|
|
can be used to fill the C data structure with the data from the config |DTB|.
|
|
This function will call all the ``populate()`` callbacks which have been
|
|
registered with ``FCONF_REGISTER_POPULATOR()`` as described above.
|
|
|
|
.. uml:: ../../resources/diagrams/plantuml/fconf_bl2_populate.puml
|
|
|
|
Namespace guidance
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
As mentioned above, properties are logically grouped around namespaces and
|
|
sub-namespaces. The following concepts should be considered when adding new
|
|
properties/namespaces.
|
|
The framework differentiates two types of properties:
|
|
|
|
- Properties used inside common code.
|
|
- Properties used inside platform specific code.
|
|
|
|
The first category applies to properties being part of the firmware and shared
|
|
across multiple platforms. They should be globally accessible and defined
|
|
inside the ``lib/fconf`` directory. The namespace must be chosen to reflect the
|
|
feature/data abstracted.
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
- |TBBR| related properties: tbbr.cot.bl2_id
|
|
- Dynamic configuration information: dyn_cfg.dtb_info.hw_config_id
|
|
|
|
The second category should represent the majority of the properties defined
|
|
within the framework: Platform specific properties. They must be accessed only
|
|
within the platform API and are defined only inside the platform scope. The
|
|
namespace must contain the platform name under which the properties defined
|
|
belong.
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
- Arm io framework: arm.io_policies.bl31_id
|
|
|
|
.. _binding-document:
|
|
|
|
Properties binding information
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
.. toctree::
|
|
:maxdepth: 1
|
|
|
|
fconf_properties
|
|
amu-bindings
|
|
tb_fw_bindings
|