rpms/389-ds-base
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.centos.org/rpms/389-ds-base.git synced 2025-02-23 16:22:54 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

import 389-ds-base-1.3.11.1-5.el7_9

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
CentOS Sources 2024-06-04 13:06:33 +00:00
parent 18389325c6
commit bdd565525e
3 changed files with 282 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

108
SOURCES/0048-CVE-2024-2199.patch Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
From 23956cfb86a312318667fb9376322574fa8ec7f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Chapman <jachapma@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 15:01:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2024-2199
---
.../tests/suites/password/password_test.py | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c | 8 ++-
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/password_test.py b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/password_test.py
index 1245feb31..e4abd9907 100644
--- a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/password_test.py
+++ b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/password_test.py
@@ -63,6 +63,62 @@ def test_password_delete_specific_password(topology_st):
log.info('test_password_delete_specific_password: PASSED')
+def test_password_modify_non_utf8(topology_st):
+ """Attempt a modify of the userPassword attribute with
+ an invalid non utf8 value
+
+ :id: a31af9d5-d665-42b9-8d6e-fea3d0837d36
+ :setup: Standalone instance
+ :steps:
+ 1. Add a user if it doesnt exist and set its password
+ 2. Verify password with a bind
+ 3. Modify userPassword attr with invalid value
+ 4. Attempt a bind with invalid password value
+ 5. Verify original password with a bind
+ :expectedresults:
+ 1. The user with userPassword should be added successfully
+ 2. Operation should be successful
+ 3. Server returns ldap.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM
+ 4. Server returns ldap.INVALID_CREDENTIALS
+ 5. Operation should be successful
+ """
+
+ log.info('Running test_password_modify_non_utf8...')
+
+ # Create user and set password
+ standalone = topology_st.standalone
+ users = UserAccounts(standalone, DEFAULT_SUFFIX)
+ if not users.exists(TEST_USER_PROPERTIES['uid'][0]):
+ user = users.create(properties=TEST_USER_PROPERTIES)
+ else:
+ user = users.get(TEST_USER_PROPERTIES['uid'][0])
+ user.set('userpassword', PASSWORD)
+
+ # Verify password
+ try:
+ user.bind(PASSWORD)
+ except ldap.LDAPError as e:
+ log.fatal('Failed to bind as {}, error: '.format(user.dn) + e.args[0]['desc'])
+ assert False
+
+ # Modify userPassword with an invalid value
+ password = b'tes\x82t-password' # A non UTF-8 encoded password
+ with pytest.raises(ldap.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM):
+ user.replace('userpassword', password)
+
+ # Verify a bind fails with invalid pasword
+ with pytest.raises(ldap.INVALID_CREDENTIALS):
+ user.bind(password)
+
+ # Verify we can still bind with original password
+ try:
+ user.bind(PASSWORD)
+ except ldap.LDAPError as e:
+ log.fatal('Failed to bind as {}, error: '.format(user.dn) + e.args[0]['desc'])
+ assert False
+
+ log.info('test_password_modify_non_utf8: PASSED')
+
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Run isolated
# -s for DEBUG mode
diff --git a/ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c b/ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c
index a20984e0b..fb65d58b3 100644
--- a/ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c
+++ b/ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c
@@ -762,8 +762,10 @@ op_shared_modify(Slapi_PBlock *pb, int pw_change, char *old_pw)
* flagged - leave mod attributes alone */
if (!repl_op && !skip_modified_attrs && lastmod) {
modify_update_last_modified_attr(pb, &smods);
+ slapi_pblock_set(pb, SLAPI_MODIFY_MODS, slapi_mods_get_ldapmods_byref(&smods));
}
+
if (0 == slapi_mods_get_num_mods(&smods)) {
/* nothing to do - no mods - this is not an error - just
send back LDAP_SUCCESS */
@@ -930,8 +932,10 @@ op_shared_modify(Slapi_PBlock *pb, int pw_change, char *old_pw)
/* encode password */
if (pw_encodevals_ext(pb, sdn, va)) {
- slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_CRIT, "op_shared_modify", "Unable to hash userPassword attribute for %s.\n", slapi_entry_get_dn_const(e));
- send_ldap_result(pb, LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM, NULL, "Unable to store attribute \"userPassword\" correctly\n", 0, NULL);
+ slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_CRIT, "op_shared_modify", "Unable to hash userPassword attribute for %s, "
+ "check value is utf8 string.\n", slapi_entry_get_dn_const(e));
+ send_ldap_result(pb, LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM, NULL, "Unable to hash \"userPassword\" attribute, "
+ "check value is utf8 string.\n", 0, NULL);
valuearray_free(&va);
goto free_and_return;
}
--
2.41.0

148
SOURCES/0049-CVE-2024-3657-7.9.patch Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
From 7f5ac2097be424a55248e391c6b40635d01b1fa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre Rogier <progier@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:18:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2024-3657-7.9
---
ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/index.c | 111 ++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/index.c b/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/index.c
index f0b969ff4..53a041ad1 100644
--- a/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/index.c
+++ b/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/index.c
@@ -71,6 +71,32 @@ typedef struct _index_buffer_handle index_buffer_handle;
#define INDEX_BUFFER_FLAG_SERIALIZE 1
#define INDEX_BUFFER_FLAG_STATS 2
+/*
+ * space needed to encode a byte:
+ * 0x00-0x31 and 0x7f-0xff requires 3 bytes: \xx
+ * 0x22 and 0x5C requires 2 bytes: \" and \\
+ * other requires 1 byte: c
+ */
+static char encode_size[] = {
+ /* 0x00 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0x10 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0x20 */ 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
+ /* 0x30 */ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
+ /* 0x40 */ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
+ /* 0x50 */ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1,
+ /* 0x60 */ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
+ /* 0x70 */ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3,
+ /* 0x80 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0x90 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0xA0 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0xB0 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0xC0 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0xD0 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0xE0 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+ /* 0xF0 */ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3,
+};
+
+
/* Index buffering functions */
static int
@@ -800,65 +826,46 @@ index_add_mods(
/*
* Convert a 'struct berval' into a displayable ASCII string
+ * returns the printable string
*/
-
-#define SPECIAL(c) (c < 32 || c > 126 || c == '\\' || c == '"')
-
const char *
encode(const struct berval *data, char buf[BUFSIZ])
{
- char *s;
- char *last;
- if (data == NULL || data->bv_len == 0)
- return "";
- last = data->bv_val + data->bv_len - 1;
- for (s = data->bv_val; s < last; ++s) {
- if (SPECIAL(*s)) {
- char *first = data->bv_val;
- char *bufNext = buf;
- size_t bufSpace = BUFSIZ - 4;
- while (1) {
- /* printf ("%lu bytes ASCII\n", (unsigned long)(s - first)); */
- if (bufSpace < (size_t)(s - first))
- s = first + bufSpace - 1;
- if (s != first) {
- memcpy(bufNext, first, s - first);
- bufNext += (s - first);
- bufSpace -= (s - first);
- }
- do {
- if (bufSpace) {
- *bufNext++ = '\\';
- --bufSpace;
- }
- if (bufSpace < 2) {
- memcpy(bufNext, "..", 2);
- bufNext += 2;
- goto bail;
- }
- if (*s == '\\' || *s == '"') {
- *bufNext++ = *s;
- --bufSpace;
- } else {
- sprintf(bufNext, "%02x", (unsigned)*(unsigned char *)s);
- bufNext += 2;
- bufSpace -= 2;
- }
- } while (++s <= last && SPECIAL(*s));
- if (s > last)
- break;
- first = s;
- while (!SPECIAL(*s) && s <= last)
- ++s;
- }
- bail:
- *bufNext = '\0';
- /* printf ("%lu chars in buffer\n", (unsigned long)(bufNext - buf)); */
+ if (!data || !data->bv_val) {
+ strcpy(buf, "<NULL>");
+ return buf;
+ }
+ char *endbuff = &buf[BUFSIZ-4]; /* Reserve space to append "...\0" */
+ char *ptout = buf;
+ unsigned char *ptin = (unsigned char*) data->bv_val;
+ unsigned char *endptin = ptin+data->bv_len;
+
+ while (ptin < endptin) {
+ if (ptout >= endbuff) {
+ /*
+ * BUFSIZ(8K) > SLAPI_LOG_BUFSIZ(2K) so the error log message will be
+ * truncated anyway. So there is no real interrest to test if the original
+ * data contains no special characters and return it as is.
+ */
+ strcpy(endbuff, "...");
return buf;
}
+ switch (encode_size[*ptin]) {
+ case 1:
+ *ptout++ = *ptin++;
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ *ptout++ = '\\';
+ *ptout++ = *ptin++;
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ sprintf(ptout, "\\%02x", *ptin++);
+ ptout += 3;
+ break;
+ }
}
- /* printf ("%lu bytes, all ASCII\n", (unsigned long)(s - data->bv_val)); */
- return data->bv_val;
+ *ptout = 0;
+ return buf;
}
static const char *
--
2.41.0

27
SPECS/389-ds-base.spec
View file

@ -38,10 +38,28 @@
# set PIE flag # set PIE flag
%global _hardened_build 1 %global _hardened_build 1
# You might be surprised to see the 1.3.11 version in the filename, but inside, it's actually 1.3.10.
# Additionally, all of the patches below look intimidating, especially when one of them is bumping
# the version to 1.3.11, but the tarball already has the 1.3.11 version...
#
# [Simon] Explanation follows:
# It was done so because 389-ds-base-1.3.10+patches in RHEL 7.9 were not equal to
# 389-ds-base-1.3.10+all of the commits before I created 1.3.11.
# (I've made a full directory comparison, and a lot of stuff was missing - something from 2019, 2020 years)
# If we release a full rebase based on Upstream, we will find a lot of new issues,
# and we may break our customers in an unexpected way.
# That's not what we want in a stable, nearly EOF release...
#
# So what I did was I used the old tarball from 7.9, then I added the vendor directory to that and repacked.
# After that, I added the required patches (for the PBKDF2-SHA512 change and a couple more).
#
# Additionally, remember that you should use the following "--target" while doing the rhpkg build. It is needed for Rust:
# --target rhel-7.9-z-389-ds-base-stack-candidate
Summary: 389 Directory Server (%{variant}) Summary: 389 Directory Server (%{variant})
Name: 389-ds-base Name: 389-ds-base
Version: 1.3.11.1 Version: 1.3.11.1
Release: %{?relprefix}4%{?prerel}%{?dist} Release: %{?relprefix}5%{?prerel}%{?dist}
License: GPLv3+ License: GPLv3+
URL: https://www.port389.org/ URL: https://www.port389.org/
Group: System Environment/Daemons Group: System Environment/Daemons
@ -206,6 +224,8 @@ Patch44: 0044-Issue-5565-Add-upgrade-script-for-new-Rust-password-.patc
Patch45: 0045-Bump-version-to-1.3.11.1-1.patch Patch45: 0045-Bump-version-to-1.3.11.1-1.patch
Patch46: 0046-Issue-4551-Paged-search-impacts-performance-5838.patch Patch46: 0046-Issue-4551-Paged-search-impacts-performance-5838.patch
Patch47: 0047-Issue-5984-Crash-when-paged-result-search-are-abando.patch Patch47: 0047-Issue-5984-Crash-when-paged-result-search-are-abando.patch
Patch48: 0048-CVE-2024-2199.patch
Patch49: 0049-CVE-2024-3657-7.9.patch
%description %description
389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server. The base package includes 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server. The base package includes
@ -571,6 +591,11 @@ fi
%{_sysconfdir}/%{pkgname}/dirsrvtests %{_sysconfdir}/%{pkgname}/dirsrvtests
%changelog %changelog
* Wed Apr 24 2024 James Chapman <jachapma@redhat.com> - 1.3.11.1-5
- Bump version to 1.3.11.1-5
- Resolves: RHEL-33337 - redhat-ds:11/389-ds-base: potential denial of service via specially crafted kerberos AS-REQ request
- Resolves: RHEL-34817 - redhat-ds:11/389-ds-base: Malformed userPassword may cause crash at do_modify in slapd/modify.c
* Wed Dec 13 2023 Thierry Bordaz <tbordaz@redhat.com> - 1.3.11.1-4 * Wed Dec 13 2023 Thierry Bordaz <tbordaz@redhat.com> - 1.3.11.1-4
- Bump version to 1.3.11.1-4 - Bump version to 1.3.11.1-4
- Resolves: RHEL-17332 - ns-slapd crash in slapi_attr_basetype - Resolves: RHEL-17332 - ns-slapd crash in slapi_attr_basetype