The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do
not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come
from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in
to CFG namespace.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS_NAND
namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely
should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG
namespace and in to CFG namespace.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When compile the slave image for boot from SRIO, no longer need to
specify which SRIO port it will boot from. The code will get this
information from RCW and then finishes corresponding configurations.
This has the following advantages:
1. No longer need to rebuild an image when change the SRIO port for
boot from SRIO, just rewrite the new RCW with selected port,
then the code will get the port information by reading new RCW.
2. It will be easier to support other boot location options, for
example, boot from PCIE.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
When boot from SRIO, slave's ucode can be stored in master's memory space,
then slave can fetch the ucode image through SRIO interface. For the
corenet platform, ucode is for Fman.
Master needs to:
1. Put the slave's ucode image into it's own memory space.
2. Set an inbound SRIO window covered slave's ucode stored in master's
memory space.
Slave needs to:
1. Set a specific TLB entry in order to fetch ucode from master.
2. Set a LAW entry with the TargetID SRIO1 or SRIO2 for ucode.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
For the powerpc processors with SRIO interface, boot location can be configured
from SRIO1 or SRIO2 by RCW. The processor booting from SRIO can do without flash
for u-boot image. The image can be fetched from another processor's memory
space by SRIO link connected between them.
The processor boots from SRIO is slave, the processor boots from normal flash
memory space and can help slave to boot from its memory space is master.
They are different environments and requirements:
master:
1. NOR flash for its own u-boot image, ucode and ENV space.
2. Slave's u-boot image in master NOR flash.
3. Normally boot from local NOR flash.
4. Configure SRIO switch system if needed.
slave:
1. Just has EEPROM for RCW. No flash for u-boot image, ucode and ENV.
2. Boot location should be set to SRIO1 or SRIO2 by RCW.
3. RCW should configure the SerDes, SRIO interfaces correctly.
4. Slave must be powered on after master's boot.
5. Must define CONFIG_SYS_QE_FMAN_FW_IN_REMOTE because of no ucode
locally.
For the slave module, need to finish these processes:
1. Set the boot location to SRIO1 or SRIO2 by RCW.
2. Set a specific TLB entry for the boot process.
3. Set a LAW entry with the TargetID SRIO1 or SRIO2 for the boot.
4. Slave's u-boot image should be generated specifically by
make xxxx_SRIOBOOT_SLAVE_config.
This will set SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFFF80000 and other configurations.
Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
The P2041RDB has almost identical setup for TLB, LAWS, and PCI with
other P-Series CoreNet platforms.
The only difference between P2041RDB & P3041DS/P4080DS/P5020DS is the
CPLD vs PIXIS FPGA which we can handle via some simple #ifdefs in the
TLB and LAW setup tables.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
We currently support 4 SoC/Boards from the P-Series of QorIQ SoCs that
are based on the 'CoreNet' Architecture: P2041RDB, P3041DS, P4080DS, and
P5020DS. There is a significant amount of commonality shared between
these boards that we can refactor into common code:
* Initial LAW setup
* Initial TLB setup
* PCI setup
We start by moving the shared code between P3041DS, P4080DS, and P5020DS
into a common directory to be shared with other P-Series CoreNet boards.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
2011-09-29 19:01:06 -05:00
Renamed from board/freescale/corenet_ds/law.c (Browse further)
