For all of the functions that access the eeprom_data, make sure these
data are valid. Use the valid member of the phytec_eeprom_data struct.
This fixes a bug where only the API revision check guarded against
accessing rubbish. But if API revision was e.g. 6, eeprom setup failed
before, but phytec_get_imx8m_eth would still happily access the data.
Fixes: dc22188cdc ("board: phytec: Add common PHYTEC SoM detection")
Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Add a new nember to the eeprom_data that indicates whether the
associated data is valid or not. Make use of this new member in the
phytec_eeprom_data_init function by setting the valid value
appropriately.
Move the eeprom data to a new struct payload that holds
the payload of the eeprom.
Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Move all function definitions in {phytec|imx8m}_som_detection from the
header to the source file to prevent potential linker error regarding
multiple definitions. Also move the #if blocks with the definitions.
Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Pointer in phytec_imx8m_detect was accessed without checking it first.
Fix this by moving the pointer check in front of any accesses.
Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
phytec_imx8m_detect returns -1 on error, but the return type is u8
leading to 255 return values. Fix this by changing the return type to
int; there is no reason to keep it as u8 .
Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Add imx8m specific detection part. Which includes checking the
EEPROM data for article number options.
Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Tested-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
