The generic filesystem interface was so far untested. The interface
is similar to the FS specific interfaces with FS specific prefixes,
like ext4ls, fatmkdir, ... but it does not have any prefixes, i.e.
it provides plain ls, mkdir, ... commands.
Extend the test parameters to include 'fs_cmd_prefix' and optionally
'fs_cmd_write' parameters. The 'fs_cmd_prefix' allow specifying the
filesystem specific command prefix, like 'ext4' in 'ext4ls'. The
'fs_cmd_write' allows selecting between 'write'/'save' command name
for storing files into the filesystem, see last paragraph.
Introduce new 'fs_generic' fs_type which is used to parametrize existing
tests and run them without any prefixes if detected, thus testing the
generic filesystem interface. Use the fatfs as the backing store for the
generic FS tests.
The check_ubconfig needs to be slightly adjusted to avoid test for
CMD_FS_GENERIC_WRITE which does not exist separately from CMD_FS_GENERIC.
The CMD_FS_GENERIC does not provide generic 'write' command, instead
the generic equivalent command is called 'save' . Add simple ternary
oeprator to use 'save' command for CMD_FS_GENERIC tests and '..write'
commands for filesystem specific tests.
Enable generic filesystem tests for basic/extended/mkdir/unlink tests.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
This fixture name is quite long and results in lots of verbose code.
We know this is U-Boot so the 'u_boot_' part is not necessary.
But it is also a bit of a misnomer, since it provides access to all the
information available to tests. It is not just the console.
It would be too confusing to use con as it would be confused with
config and it is probably too short.
So shorten it to 'ubman'.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFLszTgPa4aT_J9h9pqeTtLCVn4x2JvLWRcWRD8NaN3uoSAtyA@mail.gmail.com/
Now that opendir, readir, closedir are implemented for ext4 we can use
fs_ls_generic() for implementing the ls command.
Adjust the unit tests:
* fs_ls_generic() produces more spaces between file size and name.
* The ext4 specific message "** Can not find directory. **\n" is not
written anymore.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
We need to make sure that file writes,file creation, etc. are properly
performed and do not corrupt the filesystem.
To help with this, introduce the assert_fs_integrity() function that
executes the appropriate fsck tool. It should be called at the end of any
test that modify the content/organization of the filesystem.
Currently only supports FATs and EXT4.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At present tests are quite slow to run, over a minute on my machine. This
presents a considerable barrier to bisecting for failures.
The slowest tests are the filesystem ones and the buildman --fetch-arch
test. Add a new 'qcheck' target that skips these tests. This reduces test
time down to about 40 second, still too long, but bearable.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
In this commit, the same set of test cases as in test/fs/fs-test.sh
is provided using pytest framework.
Actually, fs-test.sh provides three variants:"sb" (sb command), "nonfs"
(fatxx and etc.) and "fs" (hostfs), and this patch currently supports
only "nonfs" variant; So it is not a replacement of fs-test.sh for now.
Simple usage:
$ py.test test/py/tests/test_fs [<other options>]
You may also specify filesystem types to be tested:
$ py.test test/py/tests/test_fs --fs-type fat32 [<other options>]
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
