Add tests for the exfat filesystem. These tests are largely an
extension of the FS_GENERIC tests with the following notable
exceptions.
The filesystem image for exfat tests is generated using combination
of exfatprogs mkfs.exfat and python fattools. The fattols are capable
of generating exfat filesystem images too, but this is not used, the
fattools are only used as a replacement for dosfstools 'mcopy' and
'mdir', which are used to insert files and directories into existing
fatfs images and list existing fatfs images respectively, without the
need for superuser access to mount such images.
The exfat filesystem has no filesystem specific command, there is only
the generic filesystem command interface, therefore check_ubconfig()
has to special case exfat and skip check for CONFIG_CMD_EXFAT and
instead check for CONFIG_FS_EXFAT.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
The implementation roughly follows the POSIX specification for
rename() [1]. The ordering of operations attempting to minimize the chance
for data loss in unexpected circumstances.
The 'mv' command was implemented as a front end for the rename operation
as that is what most users are likely familiar with in terms of behavior.
The 'FAT_RENAME' Kconfig option was added to prevent code size increase on
size-oriented builds like SPL.
[1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/rename.html
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Dalimonte <gabriel.dalimonte@gmail.com>
Currently enabling fsck on FAT16/FAT32 exposes that we have problems
with:
TestFsBasic.test_fs13[fat16]
TestFsBasic.test_fs11[fat32]
TestFsBasic.test_fs12[fat32]
TestFsBasic.test_fs13[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext1[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext2[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext3[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext4[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext5[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext6[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext7[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext8[fat32]
TestFsExt.test_fs_ext9[fat32]
TestMkdir.test_mkdir6[fat16]
TestMkdir.test_mkdir1[fat32]
TestMkdir.test_mkdir2[fat32]
TestMkdir.test_mkdir3[fat32]
TestMkdir.test_mkdir4[fat32]
TestMkdir.test_mkdir5[fat32]
TestMkdir.test_mkdir6[fat32]
TestUnlink.test_unlink1[fat16]
TestUnlink.test_unlink2[fat16]
TestUnlink.test_unlink3[fat16]
TestUnlink.test_unlink4[fat16]
TestUnlink.test_unlink5[fat16]
TestUnlink.test_unlink6[fat16]
TestUnlink.test_unlink7[fat16]
TestUnlink.test_unlink1[fat32]
TestUnlink.test_unlink2[fat32]
TestUnlink.test_unlink3[fat32]
TestUnlink.test_unlink4[fat32]
TestUnlink.test_unlink5[fat32]
TestUnlink.test_unlink6[fat32]
TestUnlink.test_unlink7[fat32]
This is because we don't update the "information sector" on FAT32.
While in the future we should resolve this problem and include that
feature, we should enable fsck for ext4 to ensure that things remain in
good shape there.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We need to make sure that file writes,file creation, etc. are properly
performed and do not corrupt the filesystem.
To help with this, introduce the assert_fs_integrity() function that
executes the appropriate fsck tool. It should be called at the end of any
test that modify the content/organization of the filesystem.
Currently only supports FATs and EXT4.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
