treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

  It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

  void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

  #include <asm/u-boot.h>
  void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

  struct bd_info;
  void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

  <smpl>
  @@
  typedef bd_t;
  @@
  -bd_t
  +struct bd_info
  </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Masahiro Yamada 2020-06-26 15:13:33 +09:00 committed by Tom Rini
parent 02ff91e8c6
commit b75d8dc564
489 changed files with 801 additions and 784 deletions

View file

@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void ftmac100_halt(struct eth_device *dev)
return _ftmac100_halt(priv);
}
static int ftmac100_init(struct eth_device *dev, bd_t *bd)
static int ftmac100_init(struct eth_device *dev, struct bd_info *bd)
{
struct ftmac100_data *priv = dev->priv;
return _ftmac100_init(priv , dev->enetaddr);
@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int ftmac100_send(struct eth_device *dev, void *packet, int length)
return _ftmac100_send(priv , packet , length);
}
int ftmac100_initialize (bd_t *bd)
int ftmac100_initialize (struct bd_info *bd)
{
struct eth_device *dev;
struct ftmac100_data *priv;