treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

  It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

  void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

  #include <asm/u-boot.h>
  void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

  struct bd_info;
  void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

  <smpl>
  @@
  typedef bd_t;
  @@
  -bd_t
  +struct bd_info
  </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Masahiro Yamada 2020-06-26 15:13:33 +09:00 committed by Tom Rini
parent 02ff91e8c6
commit b75d8dc564
489 changed files with 801 additions and 784 deletions

View file

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ void bdinfo_print_mhz(const char *name, unsigned long hz)
printf("%-12s= %6s MHz\n", name, strmhz(buf, hz));
}
static void print_bi_dram(const bd_t *bd)
static void print_bi_dram(const struct bd_info *bd)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS
int i;
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ __weak void arch_print_bdinfo(void)
int do_bdinfo(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const argv[])
{
bd_t *bd = gd->bd;
struct bd_info *bd = gd->bd;
#ifdef DEBUG
bdinfo_print_num("bd address", (ulong)bd);