mirror of
https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot.git
synced 2025-05-08 10:39:08 +00:00
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
02ff91e8c6
commit
b75d8dc564
489 changed files with 801 additions and 784 deletions
|
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void __weak board_detail(void)
|
|||
|
||||
void arch_print_bdinfo(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bd_t *bd = gd->bd;
|
||||
struct bd_info *bd = gd->bd;
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR)
|
||||
bdinfo_print_num("sramstart", (ulong)bd->bi_sramstart);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue