glibc40/glibc-2.33-aarch64-buildfix.patch

diff -ruN a/string/strcoll_l.c b/string/strcoll_l.c
--- a/string/strcoll_l.c	2021-02-02 02:15:33.000000000 +0900
+++ b/string/strcoll_l.c	2021-09-17 13:36:43.564148616 +0900
@@ -40,7 +40,11 @@
 #define CONCAT1(a,b) a##b
 
 #include "../locale/localeinfo.h"
+/* See Line 178+ */
+DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wmaybe-uninitialized");
 #include WEIGHT_H
+DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
 
 /* Track status while looking for sequences in a string.  */
 typedef struct
@@ -181,7 +185,7 @@
 	 ensures that seq->save_idx was saved to first and contains a
 	 valid value.  */
       DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
-      DIAG_IGNORE_Os_NEEDS_COMMENT (5, "-Wmaybe-uninitialized");
+      DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wmaybe-uninitialized");
       len = weights[idx++];
       DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
       /* Skip over indices of previous levels.  */
@@ -292,7 +296,7 @@
 
   int result = 0, rule = 0;
 
-  /* With GCC 7 when compiling with -Os the compiler warns that
+  /* With GCC 7 and 8 when compiling with -Os the compiler warns that
      seq1.back_us and seq2.back_us might be used uninitialized.
      Sometimes this warning appears at locations in locale/weightwc.h
      where the actual use is, but on architectures other than x86_64,
@@ -300,7 +304,7 @@
      seq2.  This uninitialized use is impossible for the same reason
      as described in comments in locale/weightwc.h.  */
   DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
-  DIAG_IGNORE_Os_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wmaybe-uninitialized");
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wmaybe-uninitialized");
   coll_seq seq1, seq2;
   DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
   seq1.len = 0;