mirror of
https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware.git
synced 2025-04-25 14:25:44 +00:00
ef738d19d3
Currently, the calling core (meaning the core which received the call to CPU_ON or the powerdown path of CPU_SUSPEND on the same core) is in charge of initialising the context for the waking core (the warmboot entrypoint for both). This is convenient because the calling core can write the context while in coherency and the waking core will only need the context after its entered coherency. This avoids any cache maintenance and makes communication simple. However, this has 3 main problems: a) asymmetric feature support is problematic - the calling core has no way of knowing the feature set of the waking core. If the two diverge, the architectural feature discovery via ID registers breaks down. We've thus far "fixed" this on a case by case basis which doesn't scale and introduces redundancy. b) powerdown abandon (pabandon) introduces a contradiction - the calling core has to initialise the context for when the core wakes up, but should the core not powerdown it needs its old context intact. The only way to work around this is by keeping two copies of context which incurs a runtime and memory overhead. c) cm_prepare_el3_exit[_ns]() doesn't have access to the entrypoint but needs it to make initialisation decisions. We can infer some of this from registers that have already been written but this is awkwardly limiting for what we can do. This also necessitates the split from the context initialisation. We can solve all three by a making a core be in full ownership of its own context. The calling core then only writes entrypoint information and nothing else. The waking core then initialises its own context as it sees fit with full knowledge of the whole picture. The only tricky bit is cache coherency - the waking core has to be able to coherently observe its new entrypoint. Calling cores will write to the shared region with coherent caches on. If we make sure to read the context only after the waking core has entered coherency, then we can avoid cache operations and let hardware handle everything. We can skip the spsr check for FEAT_TCR2 as it doesn't make a difference. We can also skip enabling it twice from generic code. Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Manish Pandey <manish.pandey2@arm.com> Change-Id: I86e7fe8b698191fc3b469e5ced1fd010f8754b0e |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| fconf | ||
| measured_boot | ||
| spd | ||
| activity-monitors.rst | ||
| arm-sip-service.rst | ||
| context-management-library.rst | ||
| cot-binding.rst | ||
| debugfs-design.rst | ||
| el3-spmc.rst | ||
| exception-handling.rst | ||
| ffa-manifest-binding.rst | ||
| firmware-update.rst | ||
| granule-protection-tables-design.rst | ||
| index.rst | ||
| mpmm.rst | ||
| platform-interrupt-controller-API.rst | ||
| ras.rst | ||
| realm-management-extension.rst | ||
| rmm-el3-comms-spec.rst | ||
| romlib-design.rst | ||
| sdei.rst | ||
| secure-partition-manager-mm.rst | ||
| secure-partition-manager.rst | ||
| ven-el3-debugfs.rst | ||
| ven-el3-service.rst | ||
| xlat-tables-lib-v2-design.rst | ||