arm-trusted-firmware/docs/components/fconf/index.rst
Boyan Karatotev 83ec7e452c perf(amu): greatly simplify AMU context management
The current code is incredibly resilient to updates to the spec and
has worked quite well so far. However, recent implementations expose a
weakness in that this is rather slow. A large part of it is written in
assembly, making it opaque to the compiler for optimisations. The
future proofness requires reading registers that are effectively
`volatile`, making it even harder for the compiler, as well as adding
lots of implicit barriers, making it hard for the microarchitecutre to
optimise as well.

We can make a few assumptions, checked by a few well placed asserts, and
remove a lot of this burden. For a start, at the moment there are 4
group 0 counters with static assignments. Contexting them is a trivial
affair that doesn't need a loop. Similarly, there can only be up to 16
group 1 counters. Contexting them is a bit harder, but we can do with a
single branch with a falling through switch. If/when both of these
change, we have a pair of asserts and the feature detection mechanism to
guard us against pretending that we support something we don't.

We can drop contexting of the offset registers. They are fully
accessible by EL2 and as such are its responsibility to preserve on
powerdown.

Another small thing we can do, is pass the core_pos into the hook.
The caller already knows which core we're running on, we don't need to
call this non-trivial function again.

Finally, knowing this, we don't really need the auxiliary AMUs to be
described by the device tree. Linux doesn't care at the moment, and any
information we need for EL3 can be neatly placed in a simple array.

All of this, combined with lifting the actual saving out of assembly,
reduces the instructions to save the context from 180 to 40, including a
lot fewer branches. The code is also much shorter and easier to read.

Also propagate to aarch32 so that the two don't diverge too much.

Change-Id: Ib62e6e9ba5be7fb9fb8965c8eee148d5598a5361
Signed-off-by: Boyan Karatotev <boyan.karatotev@arm.com>
2025-02-25 08:50:46 +00:00

148 lines
5.5 KiB
ReStructuredText

Firmware Configuration Framework
================================
This document provides an overview of the |FCONF| framework.
Introduction
~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Firmware CONfiguration Framework (|FCONF|) is an abstraction layer for
platform specific data, allowing a "property" to be queried and a value
retrieved without the requesting entity knowing what backing store is being used
to hold the data.
It is used to bridge new and old ways of providing platform-specific data.
Today, information like the Chain of Trust is held within several, nested
platform-defined tables. In the future, it may be provided as part of a device
blob, along with the rest of the information about images to load.
Introducing this abstraction layer will make migration easier and will preserve
functionality for platforms that cannot / don't want to use device tree.
Accessing properties
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Properties defined in the |FCONF| are grouped around namespaces and
sub-namespaces: a.b.property.
Examples namespace can be:
- (|TBBR|) Chain of Trust data: tbbr.cot.trusted_boot_fw_cert
- (|TBBR|) dynamic configuration info: tbbr.dyn_config.disable_auth
- Arm io policies: arm.io_policies.bl2_image
- GICv3 properties: hw_config.gicv3_config.gicr_base
Properties can be accessed with the ``FCONF_GET_PROPERTY(a,b,property)`` macro.
Defining properties
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Properties composing the |FCONF| have to be stored in C structures. If
properties originate from a different backend source such as a device tree,
then the platform has to provide a ``populate()`` function which essentially
captures the property and stores them into a corresponding |FCONF| based C
structure.
Such a ``populate()`` function is usually platform specific and is associated
with a specific backend source. For example, a populator function which
captures the hardware topology of the platform from the HW_CONFIG device tree.
Hence each ``populate()`` function must be registered with a specific
``config_type`` identifier. It broadly represents a logical grouping of
configuration properties which is usually a device tree file.
Example:
- FW_CONFIG: properties related to base address, maximum size and image id
of other DTBs etc.
- TB_FW: properties related to trusted firmware such as IO policies,
mbedtls heap info etc.
- HW_CONFIG: properties related to hardware configuration of the SoC
such as topology, GIC controller, PSCI hooks, CPU ID etc.
Hence the ``populate()`` callback must be registered to the (|FCONF|) framework
with the ``FCONF_REGISTER_POPULATOR()`` macro. This ensures that the function
would be called inside the generic ``fconf_populate()`` function during
initialization.
::
int fconf_populate_topology(uintptr_t config)
{
/* read hw config dtb and fill soc_topology struct */
}
FCONF_REGISTER_POPULATOR(HW_CONFIG, topology, fconf_populate_topology);
Then, a wrapper has to be provided to match the ``FCONF_GET_PROPERTY()`` macro:
::
/* generic getter */
#define FCONF_GET_PROPERTY(a,b,property) a##__##b##_getter(property)
/* my specific getter */
#define hw_config__topology_getter(prop) soc_topology.prop
This second level wrapper can be used to remap the ``FCONF_GET_PROPERTY()`` to
anything appropriate: structure, array, function, etc..
To ensure a good interpretation of the properties, this documentation must
explain how the properties are described for a specific backend. Refer to the
:ref:`binding-document` section for more information and example.
Loading the property device tree
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The ``fconf_load_config(image_id)`` must be called to load fw_config and
tb_fw_config devices tree containing the properties' values. This must be done
after the io layer is initialized, as the |DTB| is stored on an external
device (FIP).
.. uml:: ../../resources/diagrams/plantuml/fconf_bl1_load_config.puml
Populating the properties
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Once a valid device tree is available, the ``fconf_populate(config)`` function
can be used to fill the C data structure with the data from the config |DTB|.
This function will call all the ``populate()`` callbacks which have been
registered with ``FCONF_REGISTER_POPULATOR()`` as described above.
.. uml:: ../../resources/diagrams/plantuml/fconf_bl2_populate.puml
Namespace guidance
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As mentioned above, properties are logically grouped around namespaces and
sub-namespaces. The following concepts should be considered when adding new
properties/namespaces.
The framework differentiates two types of properties:
- Properties used inside common code.
- Properties used inside platform specific code.
The first category applies to properties being part of the firmware and shared
across multiple platforms. They should be globally accessible and defined
inside the ``lib/fconf`` directory. The namespace must be chosen to reflect the
feature/data abstracted.
Example:
- |TBBR| related properties: tbbr.cot.bl2_id
- Dynamic configuration information: dyn_cfg.dtb_info.hw_config_id
The second category should represent the majority of the properties defined
within the framework: Platform specific properties. They must be accessed only
within the platform API and are defined only inside the platform scope. The
namespace must contain the platform name under which the properties defined
belong.
Example:
- Arm io framework: arm.io_policies.bl31_id
.. _binding-document:
Properties binding information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. toctree::
:maxdepth: 1
fconf_properties
tb_fw_bindings