mirror of
https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware.git
synced 2025-04-17 10:04:26 +00:00

This patch reworks type usage in generic code, drivers and ARM platform files to make it more portable. The major changes done with respect to type usage are as listed below: * Use uintptr_t for storing address instead of uint64_t or unsigned long. * Review usage of unsigned long as it can no longer be assumed to be 64 bit. * Use u_register_t for register values whose width varies depending on whether AArch64 or AArch32. * Use generic C types where-ever possible. In addition to the above changes, this patch also modifies format specifiers in print invocations so that they are AArch64/AArch32 agnostic. Only files related to upcoming feature development have been reworked. Change-Id: I9f8c78347c5a52ba7027ff389791f1dad63ee5f8
230 lines
7.7 KiB
C
230 lines
7.7 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2015, ARM Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.
|
|
*
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
|
|
*
|
|
* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this
|
|
* list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
*
|
|
* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
|
|
* this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
|
|
* and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
*
|
|
* Neither the name of ARM nor the names of its contributors may be used
|
|
* to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific
|
|
* prior written permission.
|
|
*
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
|
|
* AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
|
|
* LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
|
|
* CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
|
|
* SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
|
|
* INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
|
|
* CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
|
|
* ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
|
|
* POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <arch_helpers.h>
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
|
#include <bakery_lock.h>
|
|
#include <cpu_data.h>
|
|
#include <platform.h>
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Functions in this file implement Bakery Algorithm for mutual exclusion with the
|
|
* bakery lock data structures in cacheable and Normal memory.
|
|
*
|
|
* ARM architecture offers a family of exclusive access instructions to
|
|
* efficiently implement mutual exclusion with hardware support. However, as
|
|
* well as depending on external hardware, these instructions have defined
|
|
* behavior only on certain memory types (cacheable and Normal memory in
|
|
* particular; see ARMv8 Architecture Reference Manual section B2.10). Use cases
|
|
* in trusted firmware are such that mutual exclusion implementation cannot
|
|
* expect that accesses to the lock have the specific type required by the
|
|
* architecture for these primitives to function (for example, not all
|
|
* contenders may have address translation enabled).
|
|
*
|
|
* This implementation does not use mutual exclusion primitives. It expects
|
|
* memory regions where the locks reside to be cacheable and Normal.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note that the ARM architecture guarantees single-copy atomicity for aligned
|
|
* accesses regardless of status of address translation.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifdef PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE
|
|
/*
|
|
* Verify that the platform defined value for the per-cpu space for bakery locks is
|
|
* a multiple of the cache line size, to prevent multiple CPUs writing to the same
|
|
* bakery lock cache line
|
|
*
|
|
* Using this value, if provided, rather than the linker generated value results in
|
|
* more efficient code
|
|
*/
|
|
CASSERT((PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE & (CACHE_WRITEBACK_GRANULE - 1)) == 0, \
|
|
PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE_not_cacheline_multiple);
|
|
#define PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE (PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE)
|
|
#else
|
|
/*
|
|
* Use the linker defined symbol which has evaluated the size reqiurement.
|
|
* This is not as efficient as using a platform defined constant
|
|
*/
|
|
extern void *__PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE__;
|
|
#define PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE ((uintptr_t)&__PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE__)
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#define get_bakery_info(cpu_ix, lock) \
|
|
(bakery_info_t *)((uintptr_t)lock + cpu_ix * PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE)
|
|
|
|
#define write_cache_op(addr, cached) \
|
|
do { \
|
|
(cached ? dccvac((uintptr_t)addr) :\
|
|
dcivac((uintptr_t)addr));\
|
|
dsbish();\
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
#define read_cache_op(addr, cached) if (cached) \
|
|
dccivac((uintptr_t)addr)
|
|
|
|
static unsigned int bakery_get_ticket(bakery_lock_t *lock,
|
|
unsigned int me, int is_cached)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int my_ticket, their_ticket;
|
|
unsigned int they;
|
|
bakery_info_t *my_bakery_info, *their_bakery_info;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Obtain a reference to the bakery information for this cpu and ensure
|
|
* it is not NULL.
|
|
*/
|
|
my_bakery_info = get_bakery_info(me, lock);
|
|
assert(my_bakery_info);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Prevent recursive acquisition.
|
|
* Since lock data is written to and cleaned by the owning cpu, it
|
|
* doesn't require any cache operations prior to reading the lock data.
|
|
*/
|
|
assert(!bakery_ticket_number(my_bakery_info->lock_data));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Tell other contenders that we are through the bakery doorway i.e.
|
|
* going to allocate a ticket for this cpu.
|
|
*/
|
|
my_ticket = 0;
|
|
my_bakery_info->lock_data = make_bakery_data(CHOOSING_TICKET, my_ticket);
|
|
|
|
write_cache_op(my_bakery_info, is_cached);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Iterate through the bakery information of each contender to allocate
|
|
* the highest ticket number for this cpu.
|
|
*/
|
|
for (they = 0; they < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS; they++) {
|
|
if (me == they)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Get a reference to the other contender's bakery info and
|
|
* ensure that a stale copy is not read.
|
|
*/
|
|
their_bakery_info = get_bakery_info(they, lock);
|
|
assert(their_bakery_info);
|
|
|
|
read_cache_op(their_bakery_info, is_cached);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Update this cpu's ticket number if a higher ticket number is
|
|
* seen
|
|
*/
|
|
their_ticket = bakery_ticket_number(their_bakery_info->lock_data);
|
|
if (their_ticket > my_ticket)
|
|
my_ticket = their_ticket;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Compute ticket; then signal to other contenders waiting for us to
|
|
* finish calculating our ticket value that we're done
|
|
*/
|
|
++my_ticket;
|
|
my_bakery_info->lock_data = make_bakery_data(CHOSEN_TICKET, my_ticket);
|
|
|
|
write_cache_op(my_bakery_info, is_cached);
|
|
|
|
return my_ticket;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void bakery_lock_get(bakery_lock_t *lock)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int they, me, is_cached;
|
|
unsigned int my_ticket, my_prio, their_ticket;
|
|
bakery_info_t *their_bakery_info;
|
|
unsigned int their_bakery_data;
|
|
|
|
me = plat_my_core_pos();
|
|
|
|
is_cached = read_sctlr_el3() & SCTLR_C_BIT;
|
|
|
|
/* Get a ticket */
|
|
my_ticket = bakery_get_ticket(lock, me, is_cached);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now that we got our ticket, compute our priority value, then compare
|
|
* with that of others, and proceed to acquire the lock
|
|
*/
|
|
my_prio = PRIORITY(my_ticket, me);
|
|
for (they = 0; they < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS; they++) {
|
|
if (me == they)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Get a reference to the other contender's bakery info and
|
|
* ensure that a stale copy is not read.
|
|
*/
|
|
their_bakery_info = get_bakery_info(they, lock);
|
|
assert(their_bakery_info);
|
|
|
|
/* Wait for the contender to get their ticket */
|
|
do {
|
|
read_cache_op(their_bakery_info, is_cached);
|
|
their_bakery_data = their_bakery_info->lock_data;
|
|
} while (bakery_is_choosing(their_bakery_data));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the other party is a contender, they'll have non-zero
|
|
* (valid) ticket value. If they do, compare priorities
|
|
*/
|
|
their_ticket = bakery_ticket_number(their_bakery_data);
|
|
if (their_ticket && (PRIORITY(their_ticket, they) < my_prio)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* They have higher priority (lower value). Wait for
|
|
* their ticket value to change (either release the lock
|
|
* to have it dropped to 0; or drop and probably content
|
|
* again for the same lock to have an even higher value)
|
|
*/
|
|
do {
|
|
wfe();
|
|
read_cache_op(their_bakery_info, is_cached);
|
|
} while (their_ticket
|
|
== bakery_ticket_number(their_bakery_info->lock_data));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
/* Lock acquired */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void bakery_lock_release(bakery_lock_t *lock)
|
|
{
|
|
bakery_info_t *my_bakery_info;
|
|
unsigned int is_cached = read_sctlr_el3() & SCTLR_C_BIT;
|
|
|
|
my_bakery_info = get_bakery_info(plat_my_core_pos(), lock);
|
|
assert(bakery_ticket_number(my_bakery_info->lock_data));
|
|
|
|
my_bakery_info->lock_data = 0;
|
|
write_cache_op(my_bakery_info, is_cached);
|
|
sev();
|
|
}
|