mirror of
https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware.git
synced 2025-04-16 01:24:27 +00:00
docs(security): security advisory for CVE-2022-47630
Reported-by: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com> Change-Id: I20be2d280437eb223c988e2bf59c4562515817a0
This commit is contained in:
parent
f53a1b6735
commit
d7156d4123
2 changed files with 160 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ Security Advisories
|
|||
security-advisory-tfv-7.rst
|
||||
security-advisory-tfv-8.rst
|
||||
security-advisory-tfv-9.rst
|
||||
security-advisory-tfv-10.rst
|
||||
|
|
159
docs/security_advisories/security-advisory-tfv-10.rst
Normal file
159
docs/security_advisories/security-advisory-tfv-10.rst
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
|
|||
Advisory TFV-10 (CVE-2022-47630)
|
||||
================================
|
||||
|
||||
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Title | Incorrect validation of X.509 certificate extensions can |
|
||||
| | result in an out-of-bounds read. |
|
||||
+================+=============================================================+
|
||||
| CVE ID | `CVE-2022-47630`_ |
|
||||
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Date | Reported on 12 Dec 2022 |
|
||||
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Versions | v1.2 to v2.8 |
|
||||
| Affected | |
|
||||
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Configurations | BL1 and BL2 with Trusted Boot enabled with custom, |
|
||||
| Affected | downstream usages of ``get_ext()`` and/or ``auth_nvctr()`` |
|
||||
| | interfaces. Not exploitable in upstream TF-A code. |
|
||||
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Impact | Out-of-bounds read. |
|
||||
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Fix Version | - `fd37982a19a4a291`_ "fix(auth): forbid junk after |
|
||||
| | extensions" |
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
| | - `72460f50e2437a85`_ "fix(auth): require at least one |
|
||||
| | extension to be present" |
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
| | - `f5c51855d36e399e`_ "fix(auth): properly validate X.509 |
|
||||
| | extensions" |
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
| | - `abb8f936fd0ad085`_ "fix(auth): avoid out-of-bounds read |
|
||||
| | in auth_nvctr()" |
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
| | Note that `72460f50e2437a85`_ is not fixing any |
|
||||
| | vulnerability per se but it is required for |
|
||||
| | `f5c51855d36e399e`_ to apply cleanly. |
|
||||
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Credit | Demi Marie Obenour, Invisible Things Lab |
|
||||
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
This security advisory describes a vulnerability in the X.509 parser used to
|
||||
parse boot certificates in TF-A trusted boot: it is possible for a crafted
|
||||
certificate to cause an out-of-bounds memory read.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that upstream platforms are **not** affected by this. Only downstream
|
||||
platforms may be, if (and only if) the interfaces described below are used in a
|
||||
different context than seen in upstream code. Details of such context is
|
||||
described in the rest of this document.
|
||||
|
||||
To fully understand this security advisory, it is recommended to refer to the
|
||||
following standards documents:
|
||||
|
||||
- `RFC 5280`_, *Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and
|
||||
Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile*.
|
||||
|
||||
- `ITU-T X.690`_, *ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules
|
||||
(BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules
|
||||
(DER).*
|
||||
|
||||
Bug 1: Insufficient certificate validation
|
||||
------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The vulnerability lies in the following source file:
|
||||
``drivers/auth/mbedtls/mbedtls_x509_parser.c``. By design, ``get_ext()`` does
|
||||
not check the return value of the various ``mbedtls_*()`` functions, as
|
||||
``cert_parse()`` is assumed to have guaranteed that they will always succeed.
|
||||
However, it passes the end of an extension as the end pointer to these
|
||||
functions, whereas ``cert_parse()`` passes the end of the ``TBSCertificate``.
|
||||
Furthermore, ``cert_parse()`` does not check that the contents of the extension
|
||||
have the same length as the extension itself. It also does not check that the
|
||||
extension block extends to the end of the ``TBSCertificate``.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a problem, as ``mbedtls_asn1_get_tag()`` leaves ``*p`` and ``*len``
|
||||
undefined on failure. In practice, this results in ``get_ext()`` continuing to
|
||||
parse at different offsets than were used (and validated) by ``cert_parse()``,
|
||||
which means that the in-bounds guarantee provided by ``cert_parse()`` no longer
|
||||
holds. The result is that it is possible for ``get_ext()`` to read memory past
|
||||
the end of the certificate. This could potentially access memory with dangerous
|
||||
read side effects, or leak microarchitectural state that could theoretically be
|
||||
retrieved through some side-channel attacks as part of a more complex attack.
|
||||
|
||||
Bug 2: Missing bounds check in ``auth_nvctr()``
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||
``auth_nvctr()`` does not check that the buffer provided is
|
||||
long enough to hold an ``ASN.1 INTEGER``. Since ``auth_nvctr()`` will only ever
|
||||
read 6 bytes, it is possible to read up to 6 bytes past the end of the buffer.
|
||||
|
||||
Exploitability Analysis
|
||||
-----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Upstream TF-A Code
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
In upstream TF-A code, the only caller of ``auth_nvctr()`` takes its input from
|
||||
``get_ext()``, which means that the second bug is exploitable, so is the first.
|
||||
Therefore, only the first bug need be considered.
|
||||
|
||||
All standard chains of trust provided in TF-A source tree (that is, under
|
||||
``drivers/auth/``) require that the certificate's signature has already been
|
||||
validated prior to calling ``get_ext()``, or any function that calls ``get_ext()``.
|
||||
Platforms taking their chain of trust from a dynamic configuration file (such as
|
||||
``fdts/cot_descriptors.dtsi``) are also safe, as signature verification will
|
||||
always be done prior to any calls to ``get_ext()`` or ``auth_nvctr()`` in this
|
||||
case, no matter the order of the properties in the file. Therefore, it is not
|
||||
possible to exploit this vulnerability pre-authentication in upstream TF-A.
|
||||
|
||||
Furthermore, the data read through ``get_ext()`` only
|
||||
ever gets used by the authentication framework (``drivers/auth/auth_mod.c``),
|
||||
which greatly reduces the range of inputs it will ever receive and thus the
|
||||
impact this has. Specifically, the authentication framework uses ``get_ext()``
|
||||
in three cases:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Retrieving a hash from an X.509 certificate to check the integrity of a
|
||||
child certificate (see ``auth_hash()``).
|
||||
|
||||
2. Retrieving the signature details from an X.509 certificate to check its
|
||||
authenticity and integrity (see ``auth_signature()``).
|
||||
|
||||
3. Retrieving the security counter value from an X.509 certificate to protect
|
||||
it from unauthorized rollback to a previous version (see ``auth_nvctr()``).
|
||||
|
||||
None of these uses authentication framework write to the out-of-bounds memory,
|
||||
so no memory corruption is possible.
|
||||
|
||||
In summary, there are 2 separate issues - one in ``get_ext()`` and another one
|
||||
in ``auth_nvctr()`` - but neither of these can be exploited in the context of
|
||||
TF-A upstream code.
|
||||
|
||||
Only in the following 2 cases do we expect this vulnerability to be triggerable
|
||||
prior to authentication:
|
||||
|
||||
- The platform uses a custom chain of trust which uses the non-volatile counter
|
||||
authentication method (``AUTH_METHOD_NV_CTR``) before the cryptographic
|
||||
authentication method (``AUTH_METHOD_SIG``).
|
||||
|
||||
- The chain of trust uses a custom authentication method that calls
|
||||
``get_ext()`` before cryptographic authentication.
|
||||
|
||||
Custom Image Parsers
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
If the platform uses a custom image parser instead of the certificate parser,
|
||||
the bug in the certificate parser is obviously not relevant. The bug in
|
||||
``auth_nvctr()`` *may* be relevant, but only if the returned data is:
|
||||
|
||||
- Taken from an untrusted source (meaning that it is read prior to
|
||||
authentication).
|
||||
|
||||
- Not already checked to be a primitively-encoded ASN.1 tag.
|
||||
|
||||
In particular, if the custom image parser implementation wraps a 32-bit integer
|
||||
in an ASN.1 ``INTEGER``, it is not affected.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _CVE-2022-47630: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-47630
|
||||
.. _fd37982a19a4a291: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=fd37982a19a4a291
|
||||
.. _72460f50e2437a85: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=72460f50e2437a85
|
||||
.. _f5c51855d36e399e: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=f5c51855d36e399e
|
||||
.. _abb8f936fd0ad085: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=abb8f936fd0ad085
|
||||
.. _RFC 5280: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5280.txt
|
||||
.. _ITU-T X.690: https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com10/languages/X.690_1297.pdf
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue